I think parts of the press really likes to redefine terms. This isn't genocide, but that doesn't make any injustices less severe. It is however a mark of sensationalist and shady journalism.
Target of the critique should be Indonesia and the companies doing the extraction. These have a profit motive. To them the destruction of the territory of these people is a side effect.
I know the Guardian has had problems with this particular term recently, there is room for improvement.
I think parts of the press really likes to redefine terms. This isn't genocide, but that doesn't make any injustices less severe. It is however a mark of sensationalist and shady journalism.
Target of the critique should be Indonesia and the companies doing the extraction. These have a profit motive. To them the destruction of the territory of these people is a side effect.
I know the Guardian has had problems with this particular term recently, there is room for improvement.