Beautiful one!
I have been a fan of hotkeys since childhood. How did you decide to choose "Cmd + C" twice? Were there other competing options that might be quicker and not in conflict with other hotkeys?
Looks like a really interesting idea here! Congrats on shipping. I just downloaded it to play around with. The screenshots are well done and make the app feel like something exciting to try out.
I would work on trying to simplifying the landing page copy, though. The "Stress-Free Bookmarking, Read-it-later, and Clipboard..." text is super long and most people aren't going to read the entire thing. I would try to emphasize what the benefit is to the user somehow. Something like "Save everything easily". That's terrible copy, too, but you get the idea. The "Super Memory Activated" and "doublememory.com" made me think at first that this is improving my computer's memory usage.
After skimming the page, I kind of got the idea about what the product does, but I think you can make it even simpler to grok right away what it does with a few tweaks. Best of luck!
Edit: one thing I noticed is I can do shift-cmd-spacebar to bring it up, but the search text field doesn't automatically get focus. That's a little bit of friction. If I do cmd-F to search, it toggles the filter UI, which was unexpected. I wanted to cmd-F to move the focus into the search to start typing.
That's gold. Thank you! Yes the refocusing can be unreliable. Currently the more reliable way is press tab to refocus. I'll work on the landing page, as that hasn't been updated for months and it's slightly outdated and didn't even highlight the now available iOS app.
That looks pretty neat! I haven't played around with it yet, but here's some preliminary feedback:
* "⌘ + C + C", to me, means "press cmd-C, then press C". It look me a minute to release it means "press cmd-C twice".
* Thank you for using iCloud sync!
* Your privacy policy says "The developer does not collect any data from this app.". Thank you!
* The pricing feels high to me. I'm mentally comparing it to PastePal (clipboard manager, one-time $15 payment) plus GoodLinks (bookmarks manager, $5 per year to buy upgrades, but you can use it forever for free). I know it's not an exact comparison, but as someone who might really like your app, that's how I personally think of it.
Agree with with everything, if there was a way to use something besides icloud that would be very appreciated. I have nothing against it but the more options there are, the better.
About the pricing, I just realized my introduction pricing has expired last night. I just created one again for $9.99 for the first year. However, I'm definitely exploring pricing, but as I mentioned right now the sub is simply a way for me to gather signal for interests, no features are behind paywalls, you only benefit of subbing right now is lock-in the early price and remove the sub button. I'll be working on real value generating features in the future.
Long term, I'm hoping to implement fair and incremental upgrades, it just takes more setup.... My current pricing is kinda anchored with ReadWise & Paste, which are 200% more than what I charge. I'm also guessing many people are looking for a lifetime purchase, I'll definitely work on that at some point, people who've subscribed will be able to redeem it directly with me once that's available.
What kind of “value-generating” features are you thinking of?
One big comment I want to give on that front is, if you decide to try any generative AI features, please please please make them *completely opt-in* and integrate with *local models* (either completely or as an alternative to cloud models like GPT / Claude / etc). If I can use your software happily without being bombarded with ads for AI features and can use those AI features how I want to instead of how would best make you money, I would appreciate that so much.
You got it. Yes, AI will be a good piece of the puzzle. Local models is exactly what I prefer, if you haven't notice, that's a big principle of this app. I'm really hoping Apple can step in and offer a local model so I don't have to download one big blob. Supporting Ollama sounds cool but I feel like that's a big barrier for many... BYOK also nice, but at that point why not just build a MCP interface instead of building another flavor of AI chat? Otherwise I'm thinking about embedding all items so it's easier to: auto-generate tags, cluster by topics etc...
That makes a lot of sense. And I’m not saying your current pricing is wrong. I’m just some rando. What do I know?
I’d definitely prefer a lifetime purchase, or even an option to pay to unlock new features for the next year and then keep those features forever, like GoodLinks does. I’m a huge fan of that pricing model.
Of course, I appreciate your perspective and am constantly collecting data points. I'll get to the pricing model experiments. Now that Apple is opening up third party payment, maybe I'll finally looking into third party subscription SDKs...
With pocket sunsetting, I have been searching for alternatives lately. After a few rounds of search, I can't convince myself to use specialized bookmarks tool over Notion / Obsidian. I wonder what other people feel?
Very nice looking app, installed. Would be interesting if this integrated with Raycast.
I would suggest hiding the main window from the dock/switcher as when the window is closed it still presents the app title. Potentially NSApplication.setActivationPolicy(.accessory)
good eye, i'll try play with that setting. Raycast does already have bookmarking features, but when if enough people make this request, i'll look into it. Or maybe expose some MCP interface so it can interact with this.
This is a really cool app! I wish you would also put your pricing information on the website (as far as I can tell the only way to discover this without downloading the app is by looking at the in-app purchases section on the App Store listing, apologies if I missed it on the website)
I believe this is so useful it should be implemented in macOS itself. Maybe not the same way as here, but having a keybind to "save stuff for later" is really useful.
But I'm not gonna lie, I was a little bit disappointed when I saw it was exclusive to Apple systems. I guess I'll have to build it myself for using on Arch Linux (and Android). Well, at the end of the day Arch is a DIY OS ;)
Many of us certainly do share these pain points, most people will lament of a closing read-it-later tool and think "if only it's open source" so they can self-host a tool that likes pocket or omnivore, thinking that's the final form of this category. Nothing wrong with that, that's a tried and proven paradigm and comes with no additional transition cost.
Because i started this not intending to build a read-it-later tool, we are working on different foundations with building blocks... we'll see where this digression will take me...
definitely want to get there soon, right now the most requested related features are apple shortcuts. Hopefully with the growing MCP ecosystem it will be a sweet MCP setup as we don't need a server or a node process.
Yes the magic command is copy twice within 5 seconds. It can be cmd + C via keyboard or context menu copy, anything updates your clipboard twice with identical content will be triggering it. You can always disable it conflicts with other workflows or apps.
Beautiful one! I have been a fan of hotkeys since childhood. How did you decide to choose "Cmd + C" twice? Were there other competing options that might be quicker and not in conflict with other hotkeys?
Looks like a really interesting idea here! Congrats on shipping. I just downloaded it to play around with. The screenshots are well done and make the app feel like something exciting to try out.
I would work on trying to simplifying the landing page copy, though. The "Stress-Free Bookmarking, Read-it-later, and Clipboard..." text is super long and most people aren't going to read the entire thing. I would try to emphasize what the benefit is to the user somehow. Something like "Save everything easily". That's terrible copy, too, but you get the idea. The "Super Memory Activated" and "doublememory.com" made me think at first that this is improving my computer's memory usage.
After skimming the page, I kind of got the idea about what the product does, but I think you can make it even simpler to grok right away what it does with a few tweaks. Best of luck!
Edit: one thing I noticed is I can do shift-cmd-spacebar to bring it up, but the search text field doesn't automatically get focus. That's a little bit of friction. If I do cmd-F to search, it toggles the filter UI, which was unexpected. I wanted to cmd-F to move the focus into the search to start typing.
That's gold. Thank you! Yes the refocusing can be unreliable. Currently the more reliable way is press tab to refocus. I'll work on the landing page, as that hasn't been updated for months and it's slightly outdated and didn't even highlight the now available iOS app.
That looks pretty neat! I haven't played around with it yet, but here's some preliminary feedback:
* "⌘ + C + C", to me, means "press cmd-C, then press C". It look me a minute to release it means "press cmd-C twice".
* Thank you for using iCloud sync!
* Your privacy policy says "The developer does not collect any data from this app.". Thank you!
* The pricing feels high to me. I'm mentally comparing it to PastePal (clipboard manager, one-time $15 payment) plus GoodLinks (bookmarks manager, $5 per year to buy upgrades, but you can use it forever for free). I know it's not an exact comparison, but as someone who might really like your app, that's how I personally think of it.
Agree with with everything, if there was a way to use something besides icloud that would be very appreciated. I have nothing against it but the more options there are, the better.
True. More options and more controls always better, just need to balance priorities. What specific sync options are you thinking?
Thanks for these feedback. I'll take note.
About the pricing, I just realized my introduction pricing has expired last night. I just created one again for $9.99 for the first year. However, I'm definitely exploring pricing, but as I mentioned right now the sub is simply a way for me to gather signal for interests, no features are behind paywalls, you only benefit of subbing right now is lock-in the early price and remove the sub button. I'll be working on real value generating features in the future.
Long term, I'm hoping to implement fair and incremental upgrades, it just takes more setup.... My current pricing is kinda anchored with ReadWise & Paste, which are 200% more than what I charge. I'm also guessing many people are looking for a lifetime purchase, I'll definitely work on that at some point, people who've subscribed will be able to redeem it directly with me once that's available.
What kind of “value-generating” features are you thinking of?
One big comment I want to give on that front is, if you decide to try any generative AI features, please please please make them *completely opt-in* and integrate with *local models* (either completely or as an alternative to cloud models like GPT / Claude / etc). If I can use your software happily without being bombarded with ads for AI features and can use those AI features how I want to instead of how would best make you money, I would appreciate that so much.
You got it. Yes, AI will be a good piece of the puzzle. Local models is exactly what I prefer, if you haven't notice, that's a big principle of this app. I'm really hoping Apple can step in and offer a local model so I don't have to download one big blob. Supporting Ollama sounds cool but I feel like that's a big barrier for many... BYOK also nice, but at that point why not just build a MCP interface instead of building another flavor of AI chat? Otherwise I'm thinking about embedding all items so it's easier to: auto-generate tags, cluster by topics etc...
as initial step, just do some “rag” / vector db thing ie. no llm. see chrome’s embedded model and how it works.
That makes a lot of sense. And I’m not saying your current pricing is wrong. I’m just some rando. What do I know?
I’d definitely prefer a lifetime purchase, or even an option to pay to unlock new features for the next year and then keep those features forever, like GoodLinks does. I’m a huge fan of that pricing model.
Of course, I appreciate your perspective and am constantly collecting data points. I'll get to the pricing model experiments. Now that Apple is opening up third party payment, maybe I'll finally looking into third party subscription SDKs...
With pocket sunsetting, I have been searching for alternatives lately. After a few rounds of search, I can't convince myself to use specialized bookmarks tool over Notion / Obsidian. I wonder what other people feel?
Very nice looking app, installed. Would be interesting if this integrated with Raycast.
I would suggest hiding the main window from the dock/switcher as when the window is closed it still presents the app title. Potentially NSApplication.setActivationPolicy(.accessory)
good eye, i'll try play with that setting. Raycast does already have bookmarking features, but when if enough people make this request, i'll look into it. Or maybe expose some MCP interface so it can interact with this.
This is a really cool app! I wish you would also put your pricing information on the website (as far as I can tell the only way to discover this without downloading the app is by looking at the in-app purchases section on the App Store listing, apologies if I missed it on the website)
I'll take note, i'll add a pricing section and Q&A section soon. Thanks for the feedback. If you are a student, feel free to ping for a promo code.
I believe this is so useful it should be implemented in macOS itself. Maybe not the same way as here, but having a keybind to "save stuff for later" is really useful.
But I'm not gonna lie, I was a little bit disappointed when I saw it was exclusive to Apple systems. I guess I'll have to build it myself for using on Arch Linux (and Android). Well, at the end of the day Arch is a DIY OS ;)
Wow I was just building something like this haha. This seems awesome, is it free? I can’t tell from the site
Same! I guess HNers have the same tendency to hoard bookmarks so we all ran into the same pain points.
Many of us certainly do share these pain points, most people will lament of a closing read-it-later tool and think "if only it's open source" so they can self-host a tool that likes pocket or omnivore, thinking that's the final form of this category. Nothing wrong with that, that's a tried and proven paradigm and comes with no additional transition cost.
Because i started this not intending to build a read-it-later tool, we are working on different foundations with building blocks... we'll see where this digression will take me...
it's free as long as you don't get distracted by the subscribe button, no feature limitations, just a bit of distractions.
I'll be available here if you have questions.
would be cool if you offered a one-time fee (like $30). many people including me are tired of subscription
noted. thanks for providing another data point!
would love support for linux, even if it required hacks or was not as seamless
I’d love to do that one day. Right now trying to find out if it’s interesting enough for 1% of Apple users to turn their heads.
Does it have an MCP server?
definitely want to get there soon, right now the most requested related features are apple shortcuts. Hopefully with the growing MCP ecosystem it will be a sweet MCP setup as we don't need a server or a node process.
Copycopy?
Is that a nickname? :D
Yes the magic command is copy twice within 5 seconds. It can be cmd + C via keyboard or context menu copy, anything updates your clipboard twice with identical content will be triggering it. You can always disable it conflicts with other workflows or apps.