From what ive been seeing. schools are hostile toward cellphones and AI.
Which is the complete opposite of what I would do. Id be actively teaching this new learning tool to the maximum.
That perhaps classrooms being >30 students and overworked teachers doesnt need to be solved, instead the endless questions from students could be sent to regulated AI options. Making the teacher's job that much easier. Perhaps even on average ending up with significantly better educated students.
>Should governments, teachers, heads of ministries up the priority of compensating the negative offsets in cognitive abilities due to the use of AI or will the progressive improvement of youngsters in/with/due AI use be enough?
There's a great deal of sensationalism, fake news around this at most.
> There's a great deal of sensationalism, fake news around this at most.
Been there, it's not. There was a Studienrat in one of my past Ex's family. They do care! But for the same reasons they lowered the reqs for "some segment" like others did for some part of my "Jahrgang", they don't get to fulfill their potential, so ... relax, it's a thing we can overcome easily.
> From what ive been seeing. schools are hostile toward cellphones and AI
Regarding my inquiry, that's a step towards intention. Intention that goes against the "currently trying really hard to force a reaction" .... dogma ...
> even on average ending up with significantly better educated students.
... think long term, think synaptic connections, think character TRAITS (singled out vs product) [linear transformations vs non-linear ones, .......]
Tangential: this is one of the topics I'm NOT bored of instantly, some people didn't just work A LOT for that one line in their resume ... there was an init
AI agents bore me back to planting red beet at the right time and what the fuck I should do about the snails that attack my "early peppers"
From what ive been seeing. schools are hostile toward cellphones and AI.
Which is the complete opposite of what I would do. Id be actively teaching this new learning tool to the maximum.
That perhaps classrooms being >30 students and overworked teachers doesnt need to be solved, instead the endless questions from students could be sent to regulated AI options. Making the teacher's job that much easier. Perhaps even on average ending up with significantly better educated students.
>Should governments, teachers, heads of ministries up the priority of compensating the negative offsets in cognitive abilities due to the use of AI or will the progressive improvement of youngsters in/with/due AI use be enough?
There's a great deal of sensationalism, fake news around this at most.
> There's a great deal of sensationalism, fake news around this at most.
Been there, it's not. There was a Studienrat in one of my past Ex's family. They do care! But for the same reasons they lowered the reqs for "some segment" like others did for some part of my "Jahrgang", they don't get to fulfill their potential, so ... relax, it's a thing we can overcome easily.
> From what ive been seeing. schools are hostile toward cellphones and AI
Regarding my inquiry, that's a step towards intention. Intention that goes against the "currently trying really hard to force a reaction" .... dogma ...
> even on average ending up with significantly better educated students.
... think long term, think synaptic connections, think character TRAITS (singled out vs product) [linear transformations vs non-linear ones, .......]
Tangential: this is one of the topics I'm NOT bored of instantly, some people didn't just work A LOT for that one line in their resume ... there was an init
AI agents bore me back to planting red beet at the right time and what the fuck I should do about the snails that attack my "early peppers"
Nothing beats effective democracy in multi-variable contexts ... except optimized democracy (in/on multi/poly-species planets/environments)