I've been using KDE Neon on several computers and have been mostly very satisfied, though I had started to notice the quality drop and the limitations had me thinking it was to to learn Arch.
Talk about good timing...
That said, hats off to those who kept Neon running, hadn't realized most of the devs had moved on.
I have not been keeping up, but limitations could be attributed to Wayland. I have the impression they dropped many things, some of it not quite baggage, to make a quick move over.
I've been using KDE Neon on several computers and have been mostly very satisfied, though I had started to notice the quality drop and the limitations had me thinking it was to to learn Arch.
Talk about good timing...
That said, hats off to those who kept Neon running, hadn't realized most of the devs had moved on.
I have not been keeping up, but limitations could be attributed to Wayland. I have the impression they dropped many things, some of it not quite baggage, to make a quick move over.
It's mostly that it's using Debian stable underneath which is nice for servers but conservative for a desktop I found.
But yeah took years before I could switch to Wayland without stuff breaking after a few seconds. Mostly a year ago or so it became usable for me.