>"Although the President has authority under the INA, that authority does not, and cannot, empower him to override existing statutory provisions and programs. Nor does it authorize the President to create new visa conditions in general."
I don't disagree, but sadly so far SCOTUS majority has decided that when it comes to Trump his actions stand as litigation drags on, making his decisions ... just how it is.
aren't these actions a reflection of the will of the people? after all, these were the kinds of things that was part of the sales pitch. the audience bought it.
>"Although the President has authority under the INA, that authority does not, and cannot, empower him to override existing statutory provisions and programs. Nor does it authorize the President to create new visa conditions in general."
I don't disagree, but sadly so far SCOTUS majority has decided that when it comes to Trump his actions stand as litigation drags on, making his decisions ... just how it is.
aren't these actions a reflection of the will of the people? after all, these were the kinds of things that was part of the sales pitch. the audience bought it.
Let’s say it is.
Then that should be congress doing this thing… if they don’t then maybe it isn’t?