Strange they just got a huge investment cycle, maybe trying too hard too fast because of that? I love using them personally but their 'database is paused due to inactivity feature' is something I wouldn't really depend upon, If I let the database get that stale I basically see it as 'gone' in a sense. If it was important it would've been replicated locally, etc. Supabase serves as the front-end layer/proxy.
Strange they just got a huge investment cycle, maybe trying too hard too fast because of that? I love using them personally but their 'database is paused due to inactivity feature' is something I wouldn't really depend upon, If I let the database get that stale I basically see it as 'gone' in a sense. If it was important it would've been replicated locally, etc. Supabase serves as the front-end layer/proxy.
Looks like making a better Firebase is a bit hard. Superbase is neat, but hosting it yourself isn’t fun.
Hopefully they’ll be able to fix this data corruption, although a backup on the same host isn’t really a backup. The whole system can have issues
I'm only hosting a newly started side project there, but it does have paying users so I'm really unhappy at the moment.
Do you have any backups aside from what’s on Superbase ?
that's not good. i have 8 dbs with them.
This is a worst case scenario. Even worse is the no-communication and not turning off the restore function. This is having serious economic impact