Somehow we have been building a not-that-social workerbee america. It's not that romantic to live in the US. Add to that more female independence, lower marriage, easy divorce and fewer families.
guys, it really was worth looking at the article: the number is 40% of women ages 15-44 would love to leave US if good opportunity came along. That's insane. But then again, the political situation in the US is insane, too.
I don't know how to say this in a way that people will believe, but unless the patriarchy is dismantled in the next 25 years, the US will cease to exist because women will have simple withdrawn from the social process. Why continue to create new people to throw into the financial/social/political woodchipper that is the US when opting out of it will eventually cause it to end in demographic collapse? If you want to save it, make it worth saving.
If, as the article says, the overturn of the constitutional protection of abortions wasn't the greatest causing factor towards a desire to leave the country, what does this demographic seek to gain in other countries such as Canada?
Popular problems such as the housing and employment crises are only worse in our northern neighbors.
They won't be burned at the stake, so there's a lot going on there. USA doesn't want them to have a life, and will gleefully let them die from basic medical complications.
All in all, Canada lacks the clear and present "cruelty is the point" the US has gone all in on.
Meh. If people don't match word with deed, it's all just cheap tawk. People much poorer with many fewer options than those of us in the U.S. leave their countries all the time and immigrate to places like the U.S., Canada, and EU.
But a trend with a delta that visible, at the scale of the entire population, marks significant cultural change. Regardless of the number that actually move.
Downvoted? You must be thinking of the success women have as senior politicians and military officers. Or the societal rejection of viewpoints like incel, tradwife or manosphere.
> But didn't women benefit from DEI? I see some workplaces and occupations completely woman dominated locally
I'm not sure what you're asking, here. Do you think all of those women are only in those positions because of "DEI", and not because they're vastly more qualified than the men around them? Do you think other countries don't also value qualified and capable women?
Or is this just some regurgitated Joe-Rogan-aligned schtick, where we just say code words and pretend like men are the only people who could possibly have any value?
Somehow we have been building a not-that-social workerbee america. It's not that romantic to live in the US. Add to that more female independence, lower marriage, easy divorce and fewer families.
guys, it really was worth looking at the article: the number is 40% of women ages 15-44 would love to leave US if good opportunity came along. That's insane. But then again, the political situation in the US is insane, too.
I don't know how to say this in a way that people will believe, but unless the patriarchy is dismantled in the next 25 years, the US will cease to exist because women will have simple withdrawn from the social process. Why continue to create new people to throw into the financial/social/political woodchipper that is the US when opting out of it will eventually cause it to end in demographic collapse? If you want to save it, make it worth saving.
If, as the article says, the overturn of the constitutional protection of abortions wasn't the greatest causing factor towards a desire to leave the country, what does this demographic seek to gain in other countries such as Canada? Popular problems such as the housing and employment crises are only worse in our northern neighbors.
They won't be burned at the stake, so there's a lot going on there. USA doesn't want them to have a life, and will gleefully let them die from basic medical complications.
All in all, Canada lacks the clear and present "cruelty is the point" the US has gone all in on.
Interesting numbers, especially compared to the OECD ones
The next big question is "Are they actually moving?"
Western collapse of patriarchy, annals of…
Meh. If people don't match word with deed, it's all just cheap tawk. People much poorer with many fewer options than those of us in the U.S. leave their countries all the time and immigrate to places like the U.S., Canada, and EU.
If we were talking about one random person, sure.
But a trend with a delta that visible, at the scale of the entire population, marks significant cultural change. Regardless of the number that actually move.
The US is run by and for elderly white males. No wonder young women want to leave.
... somewhat misogynistic (elderly) white males.
Downvoted? You must be thinking of the success women have as senior politicians and military officers. Or the societal rejection of viewpoints like incel, tradwife or manosphere.
[dead]
Friends of Jeffrey Epstein will not be happy about that ...
[dead]
[flagged]
maybe they'll have a life where their rights and independence aren't constantly under attack by 30% of the country.
> But didn't women benefit from DEI? I see some workplaces and occupations completely woman dominated locally
I'm not sure what you're asking, here. Do you think all of those women are only in those positions because of "DEI", and not because they're vastly more qualified than the men around them? Do you think other countries don't also value qualified and capable women?
Or is this just some regurgitated Joe-Rogan-aligned schtick, where we just say code words and pretend like men are the only people who could possibly have any value?
> But didn't women benefit from DEI?
Yeah, all those pesky Suffragettes...
I can't imagine why, especially when I saw an honest discussion earlier today about the benefits of forced birthing to maintain the population
I just assumed we all wanted to leave the "United" States.