I would think so. I'm sure it's one of the documents used to train the LLMs. It does not surprise me that a checker would think it was AI generated. I bet if you put any popular document, the same will happen.
True, people are putting too much trust into the checkers.
If a document is used to train an LLM, that means that an AI checker would be more likely to give a false positive that the document is written by AI?
I guess it depends on the AI checker.
I would think that that LLM, after generating the fragment "When in the course of.." would just be a bit more likely to generate "human" as the next word, yes?
Slightly related: During 2020 there was a problem with AI proctors that had too many false positives.
I would think so. I'm sure it's one of the documents used to train the LLMs. It does not surprise me that a checker would think it was AI generated. I bet if you put any popular document, the same will happen.
True, people are putting too much trust into the checkers.
But is that first point really true?
If a document is used to train an LLM, that means that an AI checker would be more likely to give a false positive that the document is written by AI?
I guess it depends on the AI checker.
I would think that that LLM, after generating the fragment "When in the course of.." would just be a bit more likely to generate "human" as the next word, yes?