Posting this as a process/governance case file (not a refund rant).
The core issues are auditability and evidentiary fairness: off-platform contact request by the supplier, reliance on untranslated submissions, “industry experts” referenced without any disclosed written opinion, and a closure rationale that hinges on an unclear “official government documentation” threshold.
I included a timeline + exhibits so others can verify specific claims.
Posting this as a process/governance case file (not a refund rant). The core issues are auditability and evidentiary fairness: off-platform contact request by the supplier, reliance on untranslated submissions, “industry experts” referenced without any disclosed written opinion, and a closure rationale that hinges on an unclear “official government documentation” threshold. I included a timeline + exhibits so others can verify specific claims.