It would be nice if these comments were used to discuss this specific article rather than becoming a general dumping ground for unannotated brief announcements about what monitor somebody uses. What’s particularly frustrating is when a commenter posts their setup, it goes against the advice given in the article, but then there is no acknowledgement that the poster has even read the article or wants to justify their choice!
>macOS has been designed to be legible and usable with a pixel density of about 218PPI (pixels per inch) for “Retina” class desktop displays. If a display’s PPI is higher, text and the macOS user interface will be smaller. If a display’s PPI is lower, text and the macOS user interface will be larger. Stray too far from 218PPI and macOS becomes unusable.
I some ways I wish I'd never seen a Retina display. I'm cursed to buy expensive monitors for the rest of my life.
The first sentence doesn’t: “ Since writing about Mac external displays in 2016, not much has changed.”
Quite a few Mac-oriented 5K and 6K displays have been released in the last few years. LG, Asus, Dell, Samsung, Benq, Viewsonic. Maybe some others as well.
It’s clear that even in 2026 most people still don’t get the pixel density (PPI) argument. Or perhaps they get it but they don’t appreciate it. For me, any monitor that is not HIDPI (218 ppi) is a non starter. Maybe my eyesight is better than the average but looking at a non-retina display seems atrocious after having spent time working on a retina display.
My work monitor is a 4K 27" from LG in 2015. I run it at 2x density, so everything's a bit larger than it would be on an Apple, but it's not as bad as this article's graphs would lead to to believe. I'd certainly rather have it than a less dense display.
I too have this one. It is a great monitor, but mine has some coil whine unfortunately. And the coil whine is more noticeable when running the monitor at 120Hz. Before getting the U40 I tried 2x U2725QE but both had coil whine that was absolutely unbearable. Either I’ve been very unlucky or the 25 series monitors just all suffer from the same issue.
I have this, extremely satisfied with the picture, size, look and connectivity. Only thing that really lets it down are the speakers are weirdly quiet in a lot of frequencies, wont matter for a lot of people but it's more annoying because everything else about it is great.
Just make sure to test it out before the return window expires because the macOS is infamous, as you are probably aware, for struggling with monitor resolutions.
I personally use a 32:9 ultrawide scaled to 2560x720 to get it to look crisp. Don't forget to look into BetterDisplay as well, neat application
It would be nice if these comments were used to discuss this specific article rather than becoming a general dumping ground for unannotated brief announcements about what monitor somebody uses. What’s particularly frustrating is when a commenter posts their setup, it goes against the advice given in the article, but then there is no acknowledgement that the poster has even read the article or wants to justify their choice!
>macOS has been designed to be legible and usable with a pixel density of about 218PPI (pixels per inch) for “Retina” class desktop displays. If a display’s PPI is higher, text and the macOS user interface will be smaller. If a display’s PPI is lower, text and the macOS user interface will be larger. Stray too far from 218PPI and macOS becomes unusable.
I some ways I wish I'd never seen a Retina display. I'm cursed to buy expensive monitors for the rest of my life.
This is an older article: Published 1 April 2022.
Not about the new Apple Displays.
To be fair, the new Apple displays use the same panel so much of this still applies.
The first sentence doesn’t: “ Since writing about Mac external displays in 2016, not much has changed.”
Quite a few Mac-oriented 5K and 6K displays have been released in the last few years. LG, Asus, Dell, Samsung, Benq, Viewsonic. Maybe some others as well.
Do they? The new Apple monitor supports 120 Hz.
The price however, isn't indicative of a 2022 product...
It’s clear that even in 2026 most people still don’t get the pixel density (PPI) argument. Or perhaps they get it but they don’t appreciate it. For me, any monitor that is not HIDPI (218 ppi) is a non starter. Maybe my eyesight is better than the average but looking at a non-retina display seems atrocious after having spent time working on a retina display.
Which monitor is recommended for work + gaming these days? Been on the fence for a new one but couldn't find any that is within my price range.
The requirement I have is that it has to be 120Hz, probably OLED and it must have built in speakers.
Any recommendations?
Not a recommendation as such, but I recently purchased this for one of kids gaming monitors:
> ASUS XG27UCDMG ROG Strix 27" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz G-SYNC Gaming
> https://rog.asus.com/au/monitors/27-to-31-5-inches/rog-strix...
Doesn’t have built in speakers, and can’t comment on what it’s like for work.
However it does look absolutely amazing!
Jaw dropping gorgeous. The colours are just so rich. I was genuinely not expecting to as impressed by it as I was!
My work monitor is a 4K 27" from LG in 2015. I run it at 2x density, so everything's a bit larger than it would be on an Apple, but it's not as bad as this article's graphs would lead to to believe. I'd certainly rather have it than a less dense display.
Dell U4025QW. 40" Ultrawide 5k2k@120hz with Thunderbolt 4 built-in and 2.5Gbe.
I too have this one. It is a great monitor, but mine has some coil whine unfortunately. And the coil whine is more noticeable when running the monitor at 120Hz. Before getting the U40 I tried 2x U2725QE but both had coil whine that was absolutely unbearable. Either I’ve been very unlucky or the 25 series monitors just all suffer from the same issue.
I have this, extremely satisfied with the picture, size, look and connectivity. Only thing that really lets it down are the speakers are weirdly quiet in a lot of frequencies, wont matter for a lot of people but it's more annoying because everything else about it is great.
Hah! I just ordered that today. ~$2200. Going to use it with a new Mac Studio.
Just make sure to test it out before the return window expires because the macOS is infamous, as you are probably aware, for struggling with monitor resolutions. I personally use a 32:9 ultrawide scaled to 2560x720 to get it to look crisp. Don't forget to look into BetterDisplay as well, neat application
The new Mac monitor supports 120hz.
I have a 5k2k 44" OLED monitor from LG. Looks great on my Mac Studio.
LG DualUp monitor is a great monitor for developers. Vertical and wide enough to show all the toolbars and the code.
Sadly they were not produced since 2024, but they are very good.
BTW, if someone is selling, I'm buying to have more spares.
I'm selling one! Email in profile, get in touch.
I am looking for an OLED display that fits Mac's aluminium design, but I still have no luck.
Just yesterday, I saw this 16- inch portable display mentioned in another HN thread.
I don't think it's OLED. But I thought it was an interesting design that might fit in with an Apple display collection.
SOTSU
https://www.sotsu.com/products/flipaction-elite-16?variant=4...
These also aren't OLED but are clearly trying to make you feel a way: https://kuycon.us/monitors
I mean for that kinda money you can have someone vinyl wrap a monitor case to match
I am using a Dell 4K monitor.https://www.amazon.in/dp/B0F29RSLHP?th=1 Works fairly well.